Cree Autonomy: a re-examination of domestic dependence

Authors

  • Stefan Johnson Graduate Student Department of Anthropology Michigan State University

Abstract

First Nations’ status definitions construed by the Indian Act of 1888 in Canada bring to mind U.S. Supreme Court decisions stating that tribal nations were considered domestic dependents or wards of the Federal Government. The Cree of Northern Québec have challenged these paternalistic definitions through their litigation of the James Bay Hydro-electric Project. I offer in this paper that the Cree independently define their status of nationhood as an act of resistance against colonialism engendered in part through their relationship with the Hudson’s Bay Company and their relationship with the land. Retention of their commitment to their existing relationship with the land has informed the Cree Nation’s decisions regarding their autonomy while interacting with Governments intent upon dichotomizing human and other-than-human interactions.

References

Agreement Concerning a new Relationship between le gouvernment du Québec and the Crees of Québec. 2002. Available online: http://www.mce.gouv.qc.ca/w/html/w1507001.html.

Carlson, Hans M. 2008. Home is the Hunter: The James Bay Cree and Their Land. UBC Press, Vancouver, BC.

Carlson, Hans M. 2009. Personal Communication.

Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, 30 U.S. 1 (1831).

Feit, Harvey A. 2005. Re-cognizing Co-management as Co-governance: Visions and Histories of Conversation at James Bay, in Anthropologica, Vol. 47, No. 2, p. 267-288.

Indian Act of Canada. 1888. 46 V., c.6, s.1 (http://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/205/301/ic/cdc/aboriginaldocs/m-stat.htm).

Ingold, Tim. 2000. The Perception of the Environment: Essays in Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London: England: Routledge.

Le Projet appartient à tous les Québécois [The project belongs to all the Québécois]. 1975 En Grande, November, p. 10-11.

Namagoose, Bill. 2002. A message from the newsletter editor, in Eeyou Eenou Nation: The voice of the People, August, p. 30-33. Ottawa: Embassy of the Cree Nation.

Namagoose, Bill. 2008. http://www.gcc.ca/newsarticle.php?id=130 PAC, RG10, Vol. 6750, File 420-10-5, reel C8106, Deputy Minister to The Commissioner, R.C.M.P. 10 December. 1942.

Peloquin, Claude; Berkes, Fikret. 2009 Local Knowledge, Subsistence Harvests, and Social-Ecological Complexity in James Bay, in Human Ecology, Vol. 37, p. 533-545.

Richardson, Boyce. 1975 Strangers Devour the Land: the story of the James Bay Project. Black Rose Books. Montreal, Québec.

Warner, Stanley and Coppinger, Raymond; Hornig, James F., editor. 1999. Hydroelectric power Development at James Bay: Establishing a Frame of Reference. In Social and Environmental Impacts of the James Bay Hydroelectric Project 2: 19-38.

Waswanipi Cree Model Forest. 2008. Milestone Report. Waswanipi Cree Model Forest: Waswanipi, Québec.

Waswanipi Cree Model Forest. 2002. The Demographics of Land Use on the Hunting Ground. Waswanipi Cree Model Forest. Waswanipi, Québec.

Downloads

Issue

Section

Articles